USPTO serial 76273129
NESTLE ICESCREAMERS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SPRUILL, DARRYL M
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with NESTLE ICESCREAMERS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 030 | Ice cream, frozen ice cream novelties, and frozen novelties, namely frozen confections | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 30, 2004 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jan 30, 2004 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jan 30, 2004 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Dec 18, 2003 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Dec 18, 2003 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Dec 18, 2003 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Dec 18, 2003 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Sep 29, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 10, 2003 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jan 7, 2003 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 18, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Oct 1, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 1, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 4, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 5, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 3, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 29, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 10, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |