Drawing for ZYOME

USPTO serial 76274992

ZYOME

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
GOODSAID, IRA
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with ZYOME?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Janis E. Adler

KLARQUIST SPARKMAN CAMPBELL WORLD TRADE121 SW SALMON STPORTLAND, OR 97204-2901UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
001diagnostic kits for scientific research comprised of biochemical reagents, chemicals for processing protein chips and microarrays, solid matrix polymer substrates, silicon substratesACTIVE—
005diagnostic preparations for clinical or medical laboratory use in diagnosing and treating diseasesACTIVE—
009Laboratory equipment for screening samples, detecting the presence of analytes and proteins, and for measuring patterns and molecular arrays, namely, fluorescence scanners, centrifuges, lasers and spectroscopesACTIVE—
042Consulting on the design, selection, implementation, and use of computer hardware and software systems for-- pharmaceutical research to screen samples, detect analytes and proteins, and measure patterns and molecular arrays; and high-speed parallel miniaturized automated researchACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (ABN6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 8, 2004ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jan 13, 2004NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Oct 21, 2003PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Oct 1, 2003NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Aug 26, 2003CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Aug 26, 2003CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED—
Aug 13, 2003CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Jul 17, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 17, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jan 13, 2003CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jan 3, 2003DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 6, 2002CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Jun 3, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 3, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Mar 21, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 5, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 5, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Sep 5, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 22, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance