USPTO serial 76275989
CON-WAY CANADA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CHICOSKI, JENNIFER D
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with CON-WAY CANADA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Palo Alto, CA
Palo Alto, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
CECILIA M KAHN
ANDREW J GRAY IV MORGAN, LEWIS & BOCKIUS LLP2 PALO ALTO SQ STE 700PALO ALTO, CA 94306UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | SUPPLY CHAIN, LOGISTICS, AND REVERSE LOGISTICS SERVICES, NAMELY, COMPUTERIZED TRACKING OF DOCUMENTS, PACKAGES, RAW MATERIALS, AND OTHER FREIGHT FOR OTHERS;WAREHOUSING SERVICES, NAMELY, KITTING, SUB-ASSEMBLY, RETURNS PROCESSING, AND LABELING OF DOCUMENTS, PACKAGES, RAW MATERIALS, AND OTHER FREIGHT FOR OTHERS; INFORMATION MANAGEMENT SERVICES, NAMELY, SHIPMENT PROCESSING, PREPARING SHIPPING DOCUMENTS AND INVOICES, TRACKING DOCUMENTS, PACKAGES, AND FREIGHT, OVER COMPUTER NETWORKS, INTRANETS, AND THE INTERNET; BUSINESS MANAGEMENT SERVICES, NAMELY MANAGING LOGISTICS, REVERSE LOGISTICS, SUPPLY CHAIN SERVICES, SUPPLY CHAIN VISIBILITY AND SYNCHRONIZATION, SUPPLY AND DEMAND FORECASTING AND PRODUCT DISTRIBUTION PROCESSES FOR OTHERS; AND BUSINESS CONSULTING SERVICES RELATING TO PRODUCT DISTRIBUTION, OPERATIONS MANAGEMENT SERVICES, LOGISTICS, REVERSE LOGISTICS, SUPPLY CHAIN, AND PRODUCTION SYSTEMS AND DISTRIBUTION SOLUTIONS | ACTIVE | — |
| 039 | SUPPLY CHAIN, LOGISTICS, AND REVERSE LOGISTICS SERVICES, NAMELY, PICK-UP, STORAGE, TRANSPORTATION, AND DELIVERY OF DOCUMENTS, PACKAGES, RAW MATERIALS, AND OTHER FREIGHT FOR OTHERS BY AIR, RAIL, SHIP OR TRUCK; WAREHOUSING SERVICES, NAMELY, STORAGE, DISTRIBUTION, PICK-UP, AND PACKING FOR SHIPMENT OF DOCUMENTS, PACKAGES, RAW MATERIALS, AND OTHER FREIGHT FOR OTHERS; FREIGHT FORWARDING SERVICES; AND TRANSPORTATION OF THE GOODS OF OTHERS BY AIR, RAIL, SHIP OR TRUCK | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | PROVIDING TEMPORARY USE OF NON-DOWNLOADABLE COMPUTER SOFTWARE FOR SHIPMENT PROCESSING, PREPARING SHIPPING DOCUMENTS AND INVOICES, AND TRACKING DOCUMENTS, PACKAGES AND FREIGHT OVER COMPUTER NETWORKS, INTRANETS, AND THE INTERNET | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by CNF INC.
- Other trademarks owned by CNF INC.
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Other trademarks in Class 039
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named CON-WAY CANADA
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 27, 2005 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 27, 2005 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jan 28, 2005 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 12, 2005 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Jan 12, 2005 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Dec 3, 2004 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 16, 2004 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 3, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jul 16, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 13, 2004 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jun 16, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 20, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 14, 2004 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 14, 2004 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Aug 7, 2003 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 7, 2003 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jul 7, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 22, 2003 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 14, 2003 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Dec 16, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 22, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 2, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 3, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 15, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 20, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 20, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 2, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 17, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 10, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |