USPTO serial 76276136
FMCG
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- EDWARDS, ALICIA COLLINS
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with FMCG?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
D-45472 Muelheim an der Ruhr, DE
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
STEWART J. BELLUS
STEWART J BELLUS COLLARD & ROE PC1077 NORTHERN BLVDROSLYN, NY 11576-1614UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 010 | DIAGNOSTIC APPARATUS, NAMELY, MAGNETO CARDIOGRAPHS, FETAL MAGNETO CARDIOGRAPHS, MAGNETO ENCEPHALOGRAPHS, RELATED DATA PROCESSING AND CONTROL EQUIPMENT SOLD THEREWITH, NAMELY, SPECIAL MEDICAL DATA PROCESSING CONTROL UNITS FOR PROCESSING SMALL BIOMAGNETIC SIGNALS, AND SPECIAL MEDICAL CONTROL UNITS AND USER INTERFACES ALLOWING MEDICAL PERSONNEL TO CONTROL THE DIAGNOSTIC APPARATUS, PATIENT POSITIONING SYSTEMS COMPRISED OF MEDICAL IMAGERS FOR DETERMINING THE POSITION OF AN INNER ORGAN OF A PATIENT RELATIVE TO A PATIENT EXAMINATION TABLE, SPECIAL PATIENT EXAMINATION TABLES, AND PARTS THEREFOR | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 15, 2003 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 14, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 5, 2003 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| May 31, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Sep 25, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 23, 2002 | 1.BD | Sec. 1(B) CLAIM DELETED | — |
| Jun 26, 2002 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 26, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 12, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 10, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 14, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 4, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 4, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 29, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 22, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |