USPTO serial 76277620
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Stephanie J. Smith
STEPHANIE J SMITH BECK & TYSVER PLLC2900 THOMAS AVE S STE 100MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55416-4463UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | INTEGRATED CIRCUITS; NETWORKING TECHNOLOGY, NAMELY COMPUTER HARDWARE FOR NETWORK INFORMATION PROCESSING; COMMUNICATIONS HARDWARE; COMPUTER HARDWARE USED FOR COMPUTER NETWORKING, NAMELY INTEGRATED CIRCUITS FOR PROCESSING AND TRANSFERRING PACKETS OF DIGITIZED INFORMATION, SOLD WITH AND WITHOUT MANUALS; COMMUNICATION CIRCUITS FOR DETERMINING THE CONTENT OF INFORMATION DATA BEING TRANSFERRED FOR THE PURPOSE OF ROUTING THE DATA TO THE APPROPRIATE DESTINATION HARDWARE, NAMELY ROUTERS, HUBS AND SWITCHES, AND FOR THE PURPOSE OF ESTABLISHING, OPERATING, MANAGING, MONITORING, AND CONTROLLING DATA FLOW IN AN ELECTRONIC COMMUNICATIONS NETWORK; COMPUTER HARDWARE FOR FACILITATING THE NETWORKING OF COMPUTERS, NETWORK EQUIPMENT, NAMELY ROUTERS, HUBS AND SWITCHES, AND CONSUMER ELECTRONIC DEVICES HAVING COMMUNICATION CIRCUITS, NAMELY COMPUTERS, CELLULAR TELEPHONES AND PERSONAL DIGITAL ASSISTANTS | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | DESIGN OF COMPUTER HARDWARE, INTEGRATED CIRCUITS, COMMUNICATIONS HARDWARE AND COMPUTER NETWORKS FOR OTHERS | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 20, 2002 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 22, 2002 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 8, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 4, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 4, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 28, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 24, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 17, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |