USPTO serial 76277702
COASTAL TECHNICAL SERVICES
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- PRICE, WANDA
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with COASTAL TECHNICAL SERVICES?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Doraville, GA
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | Coastal Technical Services is a high tech disaster evaluation and restoration company We provide consulting and damage assessments to insurance adjusters, insureds and risk managers; including loss related cause and origin assessment; restoration and repair analysis; environmental rehabilitation; and technical consulting support from the date of loss through the conclusion of the recovery process The company also provides a full range of repairs to mechanical and electrical devices damaged in disasters, including removal of contaminants such as chlorides generated in mediums such as soot from fires or water from storms The Company can restore and/or repair a wide range of electrical and mechanical devices, ranging from the most basic mechanical equipment to the most sophisticated electronic systems The Company also provides significant engineering and design services, and acts as a consultant for contingency planning | ACTIVE | May 1, 1996 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 7, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 12, 2002 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 10, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 7, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 24, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |