USPTO serial 76277780
TALENT ARCHITECTS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- LINCOSKI JR, JOHN T
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with TALENT ARCHITECTS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Elisabeth A. Evert
ELISABETH A EVERT SIDLEY & AUSTIN717 N HARWOOD ST STE 3400DALLAS, TX 75201-6538UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | employment services, namely providing consultation in the fields of human resources, recruiting, employee retention, organizational development, compensation and benefits, and industry trends; employment agencies, namely, providing employment agency representation at the executive level, providing career advice and management, and assistance in the negotiation of compensation; public relations; personnel placement and recruiting, namely, outsourcing, coordination and management of recruiting functions, recruiting of senior executives, middle management, technical and administrative employees, business research, namely, conducting research to identify prospective employment candidates via telephone and global computer network | ABANDONED | Oct 10, 2000 |
| 036 | financial services, namely providing venture capital for the establishment, operation and expansion of emerging technology companies; financial consultation, namely, providing financial and venture capital consultation, financial management, namely, management of investments and venture capital funds; providing financial services, namely, financial forecasting for mergers and acquisitions; financial analysis and consultation to start-up and high-tech companies | ABANDONED | Oct 10, 2000 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 26, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 16, 2003 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Sep 16, 2003 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Nov 7, 2002 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jul 26, 2002 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 25, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 5, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Apr 16, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 22, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 22, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 14, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |