USPTO serial 76277915
EXCELLENCE ALLIANCE SERVICENET
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- STOKOLS, GWEN P
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with EXCELLENCE ALLIANCE SERVICENET?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Kurt A. Summe
KURT A SUMME WOOD, HERRON & EVANS, LLPCAREW TWR441 VINE STCINCINNATI, OH 45202-2892Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | Nation-wide administration, marketing, and provision of contracting and purchasing services to national account customers by means of promoting and coordination accounts between such national account customers and affiliated contractors and purchasing allies; and consolidated billing services related to the accounts | ACTIVE | May 2, 2001 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 23, 2003 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 4, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 4, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 10, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 20, 2002 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 17, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 5, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 20, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 18, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 17, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 14, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 7, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |