Drawing for ORRAS

USPTO serial 76278169

ORRAS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
AXILBUND, MELVIN
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with ORRAS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Diana Michelle Sobo

DIANA MICHELLE SOBO BROWDY AND NEIMARK PLLC624 9TH ST NW STE 300WASHINGTON, DC 20001-5303UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Optical data storage and retrieval systems, namely, optical disc drives utilizing scanning mirrors and parts therefor, for use in the fields of electronic entertainment devices, namely audio recording and transmitting devices, video recording and transmitting devices, digital cameras, and video game units; computers and embedded computer systems, namely personal computers, mainframe computers, network servers, and car navigation systems; video and audio editing systems; data loggersACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (ABN6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 13, 2003ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
May 28, 2003EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Mar 26, 2003EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Mar 26, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Oct 31, 2002EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Sep 24, 2002EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Sep 24, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Mar 26, 2002NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jan 1, 2002PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Dec 12, 2001NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Oct 1, 2001CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Sep 21, 2001CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED—
Sep 5, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 20, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance