USPTO serial 76278752
TILETTES
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jun 3, 2003
- Examiner
- CAIN, CATHERINE P
- Law office
- SCANNING ON DEMAND
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with TILETTES?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
S. Hackensack, NJ
S. Hackensack, NJ
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Edward R. Weingram
Edward R. Weingram HOME DYNAMIX LLC.1 CAROL PLACEMOONACHIE, NJ 07074-1318UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 019 | NON-METAL FLOOR TILES | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jul 23, 2002 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 26, 2012 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 9, 2010 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Apr 24, 2008 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jun 3, 2003 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Mar 20, 2003 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 20, 2003 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Mar 19, 2003 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Feb 20, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 20, 2003 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Feb 20, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 18, 2003 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Aug 19, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 6, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 22, 2002 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 11, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 23, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 15, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |