Drawing for FOCUS ON LIFE

USPTO serial 76278963

FOCUS ON LIFE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
GOODSAID, IRA
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with FOCUS ON LIFE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

James E. Rosini; Andrea H. Scheidt

JAMES E ROSINI ANDREA H SCHEIDT KENYON & KENYONONE BROADWAYNEW YORK, NY 10004UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009PHOTOGRAPHIC CAMERAS, DIGITAL CAMERAS, VIDEO AND AUDIO TAPE RECORDERS AND BLANK VIDEO AND AUDIO TAPES, IC RECORDERS, OPTICAL, ACOUSTIC AND SCANNING MICROSCOPES, MEASURING EQUIPMENT, NAMELY MEASURING MICROSCOPES, GOGGLE-TYPE COLOR MONITORS, BINOCULARS, BATTERIES, MAGNETO-OPTICAL DISK DRIVERS, DIGITAL PHOTO PRINTERS, BAR CODE SCANNERS, DOT-CODE READERS AND WRITERS, PHOTOCOPYING MACHINES, ENDOSCOPES FOR INDUSTRIAL USE, AND REPLACEMENT PARTS THEREFORACTIVE—
010MEDICAL AND SURGICAL ENDOSCOPES; ULTRASONIC DIAGNOSTIC APPARATUS, SURGICAL MICROSCOPES, CLINICAL ANALYZERS FOR TESTING AND ANALYZING BLOOD AND REPLACEMENT PARTS THEREFOR; FURNITURE, NAMELY LAMPS, TABLE, STOOLS AND BEDS FOR ENDOSCOPIC EXAMINATION PURPOSES, ARTIFICIAL LIMBS, EYES AND TEETH; ORTHOPEDIC ARTICLES, NAMELY ORTHOPEDIC SHOE INSERTS, ORTHOPEDIC IMPLANTS, INSTRUMENTS USED FOR ORTHOPEDIC IMPLANTATION AND SUTURESACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 1, 2007MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jun 1, 2007ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Sep 29, 2006EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED—
Sep 7, 2006EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED—
Sep 7, 2006EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Apr 11, 2006EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Mar 22, 2006EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Mar 22, 2006EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Feb 17, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 22, 2005EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Sep 14, 2005EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Sep 14, 2005EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Sep 14, 2005ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 14, 2005REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Apr 15, 2005EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Mar 22, 2005EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Mar 22, 2005EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Sep 29, 2004EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Sep 20, 2004EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Sep 20, 2004EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jun 23, 2004CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Mar 23, 2004NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jun 12, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Mar 18, 2003PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Feb 26, 2003NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jan 24, 2003CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Mar 4, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 6, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 24, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance