USPTO serial 76279281
REFRESH
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- FRENCH, CURTIS W
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 115 - LEGAL INSTRUMENTS EXAMINER
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with REFRESH?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
CRYSTAL LAKE, IL
Overland Park, KS
Overland Park, KS
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Denise Philyaw
DENISE PHILYAW AGCONCEPTS L L C7617 STATE RTE 31RICHMOND, IL 60071-9573UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | Chemicals, namely, chemical fragrances used as an application to mask odors of pesticides, insecticides, fungicides, and herbicides for use in connection with agricultural, industrial, turf and ornamental, forestry and rights of way industries | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 5, 2006 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jan 5, 2006 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 7, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 24, 2005 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Aug 22, 2005 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 12, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 28, 2005 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| May 4, 2005 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 28, 2005 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Mar 16, 2005 | PETL | COMMUNICATION RECEIVED FROM PETITIONER | — |
| Mar 16, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 11, 2005 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Dec 28, 2004 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 28, 2004 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jul 12, 2004 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 12, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 8, 2004 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jun 29, 2004 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jun 28, 2004 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| May 28, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Apr 28, 2004 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Oct 28, 2003 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jul 16, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 26, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 21, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 10, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 30, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 24, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |