Drawing for INFORMED CHOICES

USPTO serial 76279288

INFORMED CHOICES

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
DUBOIS, SUSAN L
Law office
INTENT TO USE UNIT

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with INFORMED CHOICES?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Claudia A. Smith

CLAUDIA A SMITH HALE AND DORR LLP300 PARK AVENEW YORK, NY 10022-7402UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
016Printed materials and printed publications on the topics of healthcare and disease managementACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 26, 2005MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jan 26, 2005ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Aug 11, 2004CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Apr 26, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 21, 2004EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Mar 10, 2004EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Mar 10, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Sep 15, 2003EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Aug 25, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Aug 22, 2003EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Mar 11, 2003NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Dec 17, 2002PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Nov 27, 2002NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Sep 24, 2002CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Sep 5, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 1, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 1, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Mar 6, 2002CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 6, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 7, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance