USPTO serial 76279433
INSIDESESSIONS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- PINO, BRIAN
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE UNIT
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with INSIDESESSIONS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Universal City, CA
Universal City, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Anne B. Nielsen
ANNE B NIELSEN UNIVERSAL CITY STUDIOS100 UNIVERSAL CITY PLZUNIVERSAL CITY, CA 91608-1002UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 041 | ENTERTAINMENT SERVICES, NAMELY, THE PRODUCTION AND DISTRIBUTION OF AN ON-GOING TELEVISION SERIES FEATURING MUSIC, PUBLISHING AND FILM; ON-LINE RECORD LABEL SERVICES, NAMELY, THE PRODUCTION OF SOUND AND VIDEO RECORDINGS VIA A GLOBAL INFORMATION NETWORK; EDUCATIONAL SERVICES, NAMELY, CONDUCTING ON-LINE INSTRUCTION, CLASSES, COURSES, WORKSHOPS AND SEMINARS IN THE FIELDS OF MUSIC, PUBLISHING, FILM AND TELEVISION; EDUCATIONAL SERVICES, NAMELY, MENTORING IN THE FIELDS OF MUSIC, PUBLISHING, FILM AND TELEVISION | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 14, 2005 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Mar 14, 2005 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Aug 20, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Feb 27, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 24, 2004 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 24, 2004 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Nov 18, 2003 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Aug 26, 2003 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 6, 2003 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 27, 2003 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 20, 2002 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 8, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 24, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 24, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 5, 2002 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 31, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 25, 2002 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 18, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 18, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 19, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 30, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 24, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |