USPTO serial 76279640
MXB
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SHARPER JR, SAM
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with MXB?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Vivian Polak
VIVIAN POLAK LEBOEUF LAMB GREENE & MACRAE LLP125 W 55TH STNEW YORK, NY 10019-5369UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Business management services; business management supervision; business management planning; business management consultation; business organizational consultation; business administration services; business administration consultation; business acquisition and merger consultation; providing information about the goods and services of others via a global computer network; business management information on a wide variety of topics to service providing professionals; on-line retail store services featuring finance and investment software and publications; industrial management services, namely, auctioning, liquidating and remarketing industrial assets of others | ACTIVE | — |
| 036 | Financial services, namely, long-term and short-term investments in businesses; financial consulting; financial management; providing working capital; providing financial information via a global computer network | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Maxblue Americas Holdings, S.A.
- Other trademarks owned by Maxblue Americas Holdings, S.A.
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Other trademarks in Class 036
- Similar marks named MXB
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 1, 2006 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Feb 1, 2006 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jun 2, 2005 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| May 10, 2005 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| May 10, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 6, 2005 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Mar 25, 2005 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 25, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 26, 2005 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jan 26, 2005 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Dec 10, 2004 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 26, 2004 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Aug 13, 2004 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 3, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| May 26, 2004 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Apr 26, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 31, 2003 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 28, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 26, 2003 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jun 27, 2003 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| May 28, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 26, 2003 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Nov 26, 2002 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Sep 3, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 14, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 7, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 16, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 16, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 15, 2002 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 13, 2002 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| May 6, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 6, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 28, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 29, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 27, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |