USPTO serial 76279867
MINIMAN
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- EDWARDS, ALICIA COLLINS
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with MINIMAN?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
08020 Barcelona, ES
08020 Barcelona, ES
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
David A. Weinstein
DAVID A WEINSTEIN DAVID A WEINSTEIN ATTORNEY AT LAW1600 BROADWAY STE 2600DENVER, CO 80202UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 016 | Children's magazines; printed publications, namely children's workbooks, comics namely comic books, newspaper comic strips; goods made of paper and cardboard, namely cut-outs for decorating paper, folders, notebooks, calendars, educational and recreational children's books; posters, promotional catalogs for others of recreational and educational children's activities; recreational and educational brochures for children; photographs; stationery; plastic for packaging, namely, bags; adhesives for stationery or household purposes; printing blocks | ABANDONED | — |
| 038 | COMPUTER-AIDED TRANSMISSION OF MESSAGES AND IMAGES; TRANSMISSION OF INFORMATION VIA PRIVATE OR PUBLIC TELECOMMUNICATIONS NETWORKS; PROVIDING MULTIPLE USER ACCESS TO A GLOBAL COMPUTER INFORMATION NETWORK; COMMUNICATIONS BY OPTICAL FIBER NETWORKS; COMMUNICATION BY COMPUTER TERMINALS; COMMUNICATIONS BY TELEGRAMS; RADIO BROADCASTING; TELEVISION BROADCASTING; PROVIDING INFORMATION ABOUT TELECOMMUNICATIONS CONNECTIONS; ELECTRONIC MAIL SERVICES; TELEPHONE COMMUNICATION SERVICES; CELLULAR TELEPHONE COMMUNICATION; SATELLITE TRANSMISSION; CABLE TELEVISION BROADCASTING; PROVIDING TELECOMMUNICATIONS CONNECTIONS TO A GLOBAL COMPUTER NETWORK; RENTAL OF TELECOMMUNICATIONS APPARATUS; RENTAL OF MESSAGE SENDING APPARATUS | ABANDONED | — |
| 041 | Rental of motion pictures; rental of video tapes; movie studios; providing movie theatre facilities; video tape editing; video-tape film production; publication of texts; recording studio services; film production, namely cartoons; publication of books; production of radio and television programs; television entertainment, namely distribution of television programs for others, on-going television programs in the field of children's education and entertainment; educational services, namely providing courses, seminars workshops though the use of cartoons in the field of children's education; organizing community sporting and cultural activities; organization of exhibitions for cultural or educational purposes; arranging and conducting of educational colloquiums, conferences, congresses, seminars and symposiums in the field of children's education | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 7, 2005 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Jul 7, 2005 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Jul 7, 2005 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jul 7, 2005 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Feb 25, 2005 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Feb 25, 2005 | TTBN | CASE ASSIGNED TO TTAB | — |
| Feb 25, 2005 | IUCN | NOTICE OF ALLOWANCE CANCELLED | — |
| Feb 23, 2005 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 12, 2004 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Aug 18, 2004 | ETOP | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE PROCESS - TERMINATED | — |
| Feb 12, 2004 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 13, 2004 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 24, 2003 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Nov 12, 2003 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 12, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 12, 2003 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 14, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 10, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| May 21, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 21, 2003 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 24, 2003 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 3, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 3, 2002 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 17, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 19, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 11, 2002 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 9, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 14, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |