USPTO serial 76280243
EMPEROR NORTON RECORDS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3105438Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jun 20, 2006
- Examiner
- CROSS, TRACY L
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with EMPEROR NORTON RECORDS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Los Angeles, CA
Los Angeles, CA
Los Angeles, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jason M. Vogel
Jason M. Vogel Kilpatrick Stockton LLP31 West 52nd Street, 14th FloorNew York, NY 10019UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Promoting the goods and services of others through direct mail advertising and the distribution of printed and audio promotional materials in the field of sound recordings and musical performances; advertising agency services in the field of sound recordings and musical performances of entertainment personalities; management of musical performers | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Apr 15, 1996 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 23, 2024 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Jan 25, 2013 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Dec 9, 2010 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 9, 2010 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 3, 2009 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Mar 6, 2007 | UNDN | UNDELIVERABLE MAIL - NO ACTION TAKEN | — |
| Jan 10, 2007 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 20, 2006 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Dec 9, 2004 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Nov 9, 2004 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 20, 2004 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 8, 2004 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 3, 2004 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 3, 2004 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 1, 2004 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 24, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 24, 2004 | EXAR | EXPARTE APPEAL AFFIRMED/REVERSED IN PART | — |
| Apr 28, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 23, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 6, 2004 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Mar 4, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Nov 20, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 25, 2003 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Jul 3, 2003 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| May 29, 2003 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| May 29, 2003 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| May 22, 2003 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| May 12, 2003 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| May 6, 2003 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Jan 27, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 16, 2003 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Jan 13, 2003 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Dec 4, 2002 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 20, 2002 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 29, 2002 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 11, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 11, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 22, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |