USPTO serial 76280525
WE COMMIT WE DELIVER NO EXCUSES
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- VOGLER, ANN LINNEHAN
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with WE COMMIT WE DELIVER NO EXCUSES?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Panama City, FL
Panama City, FL
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Marina Bongiorno
Marina Bongiorno General Electric Company3135 Easton TurnpikeCorporate Trademark OperationFairfield, CT 06828Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 006 | Flexible metal pipes, cables, pipeline reinforcing materials, namely, metallic steel plates, and metal pipeline products, namely, metal flanges and connectors, mandrels, metal pipe couplings and joints for use in the conveyance of gas and fluids in the oil and gas industry | ACTIVE | — |
| 017 | FLEXIBLE NON-METAL PIPES, CABLES, PIPELINE REINFORCING MATERIALS, NAMELY, POLYMER AND NON-METAL PLATES, AND NON-METAL PIPELINE PRODUCTS, NAMELY, NON-METAL PIPE COUPLINGS AND JOINTS FOR USE IN THE CONVEYANCE OF GAS AND FLUIDS IN THE OIL AND GAS INDUSTRY | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Wellstream, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Wellstream, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 006
- Other trademarks in Class 017
- Similar marks named WE COMMIT WE DELIVER NO EXCUSES
- Prosecution event ARAA explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 12, 2016 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 12, 2016 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| May 31, 2006 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Sep 27, 2005 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 27, 2005 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Feb 1, 2005 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 11, 2005 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Jan 11, 2005 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Aug 10, 2004 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 26, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jul 15, 2004 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Jul 15, 2004 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Apr 26, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 10, 2004 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 9, 2004 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 16, 2004 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jan 16, 2004 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Nov 19, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 10, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 22, 2003 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 15, 2003 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jul 15, 2003 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jan 28, 2003 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 4, 2002 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Dec 4, 2002 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jul 16, 2002 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Apr 23, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 3, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Dec 12, 2001 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 21, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 30, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 29, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 23, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 16, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |