Drawing for BRT

USPTO serial 76280749

BRT

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
OSLICK, SCOTT
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with BRT?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Frank J. Colucci, Esq.

FRANK J COLUCCI ESQ COLUCCI & UMANSMANHATTAN TWR101 E 52ND STNEW YORK, NY 10022-6000

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Equipment which generates and discharges batteries of all types and sizes, namely, gel cell and lead acid storage batteriesACTIVE—
037regeneration and discharging services for batteries of all types and sizesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 3, 2004ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED—
Feb 3, 2004CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Jan 26, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 26, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Aug 1, 2003CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Jun 19, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 19, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Dec 24, 2002CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Nov 27, 2002CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Nov 13, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 4, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 4, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jun 13, 2002CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Feb 15, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 10, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 7, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance