Drawing for CLOUD BYTES

USPTO serial 76281147

CLOUD BYTES

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
SPRUILL, DARRYL M
Law office
DIVISIONAL UNIT

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with CLOUD BYTES?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Stewart L. Gitler

STEWART L GITLER HOFFMAN, WASSON & GITLER, PC2361 JEFFERSON DAVIS HWYSTE 522ARLINGTON, VA 22202-3856

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
030flavor filled marshmallowsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 25, 2005MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jan 25, 2005ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jul 22, 2004CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Apr 26, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 18, 2004EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Mar 1, 2004EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Mar 1, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Sep 24, 2003EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Sep 4, 2003EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Sep 4, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
May 28, 2003EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Mar 4, 2003EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Mar 4, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jan 14, 2003EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Jan 14, 2003PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Dec 24, 2002ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Sep 19, 2002PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED—
Sep 19, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Sep 5, 2002EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Mar 5, 2002NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Dec 11, 2001PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Nov 21, 2001NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Aug 28, 2001CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Aug 28, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance