Drawing for METSO POWDERMET

USPTO serial 76281504

METSO POWDERMET

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
NEVILLE, BRIAN
Law office
TTAB

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with METSO POWDERMET?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Mark I. Peroff

MARK I PEROFF KIRKPATRICK & LOCKHART NICHOLSON GRAHAM599 LEXINGTON AVENEW YORK, NY 10022-6030UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
006Foundry products, metal casting products and powder metallurgical productsACTIVE—
037Repair, installation and maintenance services related to foundry products, metal casting products and powder metallurgical products, and to machines parts of which these products areACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 23, 2007MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Feb 23, 2007DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 30, 2007EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Jan 30, 2007EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Dec 7, 2006ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Dec 7, 2006EXFBEXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF—
Oct 31, 2006EXARTEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED—
Jun 5, 2006TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Mar 2, 2006EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Feb 15, 2006EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Aug 8, 2005CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Aug 8, 2005CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jul 15, 2005ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Jul 11, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 11, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Apr 18, 2005CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Apr 18, 2005CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Mar 18, 2005ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Feb 25, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 25, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Aug 27, 2004CNSIINQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED—
Aug 23, 2004RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Mar 27, 2004TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Dec 24, 2003CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Dec 9, 2003CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Nov 14, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 14, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
May 16, 2003CNSIINQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED—
May 20, 2002CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Mar 8, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 8, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Sep 10, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 7, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 17, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance