USPTO serial 76281529
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Howard A. MacCord, Jr.
Ultimus, Inc.15200 Weston ParkwaySuite 106Cary, NC 27513| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | PROVIDING OFFICE AND WORKFLOW AUTOMATION SERVICES OVER THE INTERNET | SECTION 18 - CANCELLED | Mar 15, 2002 |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 11, 2007 | C18. | CANCELLED SECTION 18-TOTAL | — |
| Apr 11, 2007 | CANT | CANCELLATION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Oct 4, 2006 | CANG | CANCELLATION GRANTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jun 15, 2006 | PETC | CANCELLATION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Feb 4, 2003 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Nov 20, 2002 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 20, 2002 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Nov 20, 2002 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Oct 15, 2002 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Oct 15, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 15, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 11, 2002 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 15, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 15, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 14, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 12, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |