Drawing for WORKFLOW.NET

USPTO serial 76281529

WORKFLOW.NET

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 2684907Status 713
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Feb 4, 2003
Examiner
MAYERSCHOFF, GLENN
Law office
TTAB

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with WORKFLOW.NET?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Howard A. MacCord, Jr.

Ultimus, Inc.15200 Weston ParkwaySuite 106Cary, NC 27513

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
042PROVIDING OFFICE AND WORKFLOW AUTOMATION SERVICES OVER THE INTERNETSECTION 18 - CANCELLEDMar 15, 2002

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 11, 2007C18.CANCELLED SECTION 18-TOTAL—
Apr 11, 2007CANTCANCELLATION TERMINATED NO. 999999—
Oct 4, 2006CANGCANCELLATION GRANTED NO. 999999—
Jun 15, 2006PETCCANCELLATION INSTITUTED NO. 999999—
Feb 4, 2003R.SRREGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTERYour mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application.
Nov 20, 2002CNTAAPPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER—
Nov 20, 2002IUAAUSE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED—
Nov 20, 2002AUPCAMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Oct 15, 2002IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILED—
Oct 15, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 15, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Apr 11, 2002CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Mar 15, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 15, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Sep 14, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 12, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance