Drawing for BRASSELER CANADA

USPTO serial 76281733

BRASSELER CANADA

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
PAPPAS, MATTHEW
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with BRASSELER CANADA?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Edward E. Vassallo

EDWARD E VASSALLO FITZPATRICK CELLA HARPER & SCINTO30 ROCKEFELLER PLZNEW YORK, NY 10112-0002UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
007Hand engines for use in dental applications, namely, electric apparatus consisting of a motor and a connecting rotating hand piece used to insert drilling bitsACTIVE—
008Sharpening stonesACTIVE—
009Electric controls for dental rotary tooth cuttersACTIVE—
010Dental rotary instruments for use in treatment of patients, namely, burs, steel drill bits, carbide-tipped drill bits, diamond-plated drill bits, cutters, drills and mandrels; dental rotary abrasive drill points, grinding stones, grinding wheels, polishing wheels and cutting discs; dental instruments, namely, forceps, curettes, scissors, hemostats, ronguers, needle holders, scalers, carvers, burnishers, pluggers, excavators, amalgam carriers, mirrors, spatulas, explorers, spreaders, probes, chisels, knives and files; dental apparatus for esthetic trimming, namely, steel serrated saw blades and diamond-coated interproximal finishing strips; dental pins and posts; endodontic instruments, namely, root canal files, reamers, broaches, pluggers and spreadersACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (ABN6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 16, 2004ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jun 9, 2004CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Dec 16, 2003NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Sep 23, 2003PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Sep 3, 2003NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jul 7, 2003CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jul 3, 2003CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED—
Jan 2, 2003CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 21, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 21, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jun 10, 2002CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Mar 8, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 8, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Sep 5, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 20, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 18, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance