USPTO serial 76282282
EPRT TECHNOLOGIES
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- FLETCHER, TRACY L
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with EPRT TECHNOLOGIES?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Pacific Palisades, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Katherine M. Basile
KATHERINE M BASILE HOWREY SIMON ARNOLD & WHITE LLP750 BERING DRHOUSTON, TX 77057-2149UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 010 | Medical electro-magnetic therapy devices, namely energy enhancing devices, cosmetic stretch mark devices, pain and wound healing devices, and water purifying devices; medical deices for pain relief, inducing cell proliferation, stimulating angiogenesis, soft tissue regeneration and wound healing, namely energy enhancing devices, cosmetic stretch mark devices, pain and wound healing devices, and water purifying devices; and related documentation and manuals sold and shipped with the goods as a unit therewith | ACTIVE | Feb 27, 2001 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 25, 2003 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 12, 2002 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 5, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 5, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 13, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 27, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |