Drawing for ENDOCARE

USPTO serial 76282360

ENDOCARE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
DEFORD, JEFFREY S
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with ENDOCARE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

LAWRENCE N GINSBERG

LAWRENCE N GINSBERG ENDOCARE, INC201 TECHNOLOGY DRIRVINE, CA 92618UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
010MEDICAL DEVICES AND INSTRUMENTS FOR USE IN SURGICAL APPLICATIONS, NAMELY, CRYOSURGICAL SYSTEMS, CRYOSURGICAL PROBES, AND UROLOGICAL STENT DEVICESACTIVEJul 19, 1996
041EDUCATIONAL SERVICES, NAMELY CONDUCTING CLASSES, SEMINARS, CONFERENCES AND WORKSHOPS IN THE FIELD OF MEDICAL AND SURGICAL DEVICES AND TECHNIQUES; PROVIDING CONTINUING EDUCATION COURSES, NAMELY, TRAINING AND EDUCATIONAL SERVICES IN THE FIELD OF MEDICAL AND SURGICAL DEVICES AND TECHNIQUESACTIVEJul 19, 1996

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 11, 2003CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Dec 4, 2003EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Dec 4, 2003EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Jul 15, 2003EXFBEXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF—
Apr 30, 2003ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Feb 25, 2003RECDACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED—
Nov 15, 2002JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Nov 15, 2002EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Oct 31, 2002EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Apr 23, 2002CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Apr 18, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 11, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 11, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Feb 20, 2002UNPRUNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED—
Sep 12, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 4, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 27, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance