Drawing for ANTRIS

USPTO serial 76282428

ANTRIS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
FLETCHER, TRACY L
Law office
TTAB

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with ANTRIS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

JEFFREY D SANOK

JEFFREY D SANOK CROWELL & MORING, LLPPO BOX 14300WASHINGTON, DC 20044UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
001Chemical products for use in the manufacture of analytical apparatus, namely, selective ligands, sensor membranes, selective layers, sensor cartridges, and sensor modulesACTIVE—
009apparatus for chemical, optical, ionselective and biological analyses, namely, automated flow-through process analyzersACTIVE—
010Testing apparatus for medical purposes, namely, automated clinical analyzersACTIVE—
042Scientific research, namely, chemical, optical, ionselective and biological analysesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 17, 2003EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Mar 13, 2003ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED—
Feb 26, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Feb 10, 2003JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Feb 10, 2003EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Feb 10, 2003EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Feb 3, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 3, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jan 10, 2003EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Jul 1, 2002CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Mar 12, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 12, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 27, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance