USPTO serial 76282428
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
JEFFREY D SANOK
JEFFREY D SANOK CROWELL & MORING, LLPPO BOX 14300WASHINGTON, DC 20044UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | Chemical products for use in the manufacture of analytical apparatus, namely, selective ligands, sensor membranes, selective layers, sensor cartridges, and sensor modules | ACTIVE | — |
| 009 | apparatus for chemical, optical, ionselective and biological analyses, namely, automated flow-through process analyzers | ACTIVE | — |
| 010 | Testing apparatus for medical purposes, namely, automated clinical analyzers | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Scientific research, namely, chemical, optical, ionselective and biological analyses | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 17, 2003 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Mar 13, 2003 | ABN1 | ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED | — |
| Feb 26, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 10, 2003 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Feb 10, 2003 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Feb 10, 2003 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Feb 3, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 3, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 10, 2003 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Jul 1, 2002 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 12, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 12, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 27, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |