USPTO serial 76282624
MILLENIUM
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- OH, WON TEAK
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with MILLENIUM?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
CHATSWOOD, NEW SOUTH WALES, AU
CHATSWOOD, NEW SOUTH WALES, AU
Sunshine General Industries Pty. Ltd.
Chatswood, New South Wales, AU
Other trademarks owned by Sunshine General Industries Pty. Ltd.
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Paul F. Kilmer
PAUL F KILMER HOLLAND & KNIGHT LLPSTE 1002099 PENNSYLVANIA AVE N WWASHINGTON, DC 20006-6801Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 011 | Gas barbecues and grills and structural parts therefor; stands for barbecues, with and without wheels; outdoor gas heaters and structural parts therefor | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by ARLEC BARBEQUES PTY LIMITED
- Other trademarks owned by ARLEC BARBEQUES PTY LIMITED
- Other trademarks owned by Sunshine General Industries Pty. Ltd.
- Other trademarks in Class 011
- Similar marks named MILLENIUM
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 9, 2005 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Nov 9, 2005 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 2, 2005 | UNDN | UNDELIVERABLE MAIL - NO ACTION TAKEN | — |
| May 2, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 6, 2005 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 3, 2005 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Mar 3, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 1, 2004 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 1, 2004 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Sep 1, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 13, 2004 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 8, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Mar 2, 2004 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Mar 2, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 27, 2003 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 31, 2003 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jul 31, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 4, 2003 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Dec 10, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 20, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 30, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 3, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 3, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 29, 2002 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 2, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 2, 2002 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Apr 13, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 1, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 4, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 20, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |