Drawing for SUNSHINE

USPTO serial 76282729

SUNSHINE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
VERHOSEK, WILLIAM T
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with SUNSHINE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Paul F. Kilmer,

PAUL F KILMER, HOLLAND & KNIGHT LLP2099 PENNSYLVANIA AVE NW STE 100WASHINGTON, DC 20006-6801UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
011Gas barbecues and grills and structural parts therefor; stands for barbecues, with and without wheels; outdoor gas heaters and structural parts thereforACTIVE—
020Outdoor furniture, namely, metal and non-metal tables, chairs and loungesACTIVE—
021Barbecue implements, namely, tongs, barbecue forks, barbecue food lifters, namely, spatulas, and barbecue cleaning tools, namely, scrapersACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 24, 2006MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Feb 24, 2006ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jun 27, 2005EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Jun 16, 2005EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Jun 16, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Dec 30, 2004EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Dec 8, 2004EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Dec 8, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jul 1, 2004EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Jun 25, 2004CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Jun 14, 2004EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Jun 14, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jan 14, 2004EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Dec 10, 2003EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Dec 10, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jun 17, 2003NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Mar 25, 2003PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Mar 5, 2003NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Feb 4, 2003CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jan 27, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 23, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 24, 2002CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
May 30, 2002CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED—
May 30, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 25, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 24, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 31, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance