USPTO serial 76282838
CLEAR!BLUE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3008129Status 711
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Oct 25, 2005
- Examiner
- WELLS, KELLEY L
- Law office
- POST REGISTRATION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with CLEAR!BLUE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Birmingham, MI
BIRMINGHAM, MI
BIRMINGHAM, MI
BIRMINGHAM, MI
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
JEFFREY P. THENNISHCH
JEFFREY P THENNISHCH DOBRUSIN & THENNISCH PC29 W LAWRENCE STE 210PONTIAC, MI 48342UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 038 | Communication services; namely, delivering and transmitting live event content and streamed sound and audio-visual recordings via live presentation, remote video conferencing, webcasting, and the Internet for strategic events | SECTION 7(e) - CANCELLED | Aug 2, 2000 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Clear Blue, LLC
- Other trademarks owned by CLEAR!BLUE HOLDINGS, LLC
- Other trademarks owned by CLEAR!BLUE HOLDINGS, LLC
- Other trademarks owned by CLEAR!BLUE HOLDINGS, LLC
- Other trademarks in Class 038
- Similar marks named CLEAR!BLUE
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 5, 2008 | C7.. | CANCELLED SECTION 7-TOTAL | — |
| Nov 19, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 22, 2008 | C7RF | REQUEST FOR SECT 7 TOTAL SURRENDER FILED | — |
| May 27, 2008 | NOSU | NOTICE OF SUIT | — |
| Oct 25, 2005 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Aug 2, 2005 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 13, 2005 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Apr 14, 2005 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Apr 8, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 5, 2005 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 4, 2005 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Mar 23, 2005 | EXPR | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL REVERSED | — |
| Mar 14, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 11, 2005 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 19, 2004 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Nov 18, 2004 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 20, 2004 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Sep 13, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 14, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 12, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 11, 2004 | RECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED | — |
| Feb 9, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Feb 4, 2004 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Feb 4, 2004 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Feb 2, 2004 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Jan 23, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 22, 2003 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 23, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 16, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 16, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 20, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 22, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 11, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 11, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 6, 2002 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 12, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 22, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 14, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 20, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 13, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 28, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |