USPTO serial 76283445
MOST MODULAR OPEN SYSTEM TECHNOLOGY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CHISOLM, KEVON
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with MOST MODULAR OPEN SYSTEM TECHNOLOGY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
James D. Nohl
JAMES D NOHL HOLLAND & KNIGHT LLP10 SAINT JAMES AVEBOSTON, MA 02116-3803UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | COMPUTER HARDWARE AND SOFTWARE MODULES FOR USE IN DATA ACQUISITION AND DATABASE MANAGEMENT IN THE PROCESS AUTOMATION INDUSTRIES EXCLUDING COMPUTER HARDWARE AND COMPUTER SOFTWARE FOR THE TRANSFER OF MULTIMEDIA DATA AND COMPUTER HARDWARE AND COMPUTER SOFTWARE FOR SYNCHRONOUS COMMUNICATIONS, EITHER POINT TO POINT OR ON A LOCAL AREA NETWORK UTILIZING A RING TOPOLOGY AND USING ANY OF A NUMBER OF DIFFERENT TRANSMISSION MEDIA | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 21, 2004 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 11, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jun 3, 2003 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Mar 11, 2003 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Feb 19, 2003 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 9, 2003 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 2, 2003 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Nov 26, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 12, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 12, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 6, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 16, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 14, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 14, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 14, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 24, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |