Drawing for CONNEXIONS OFFICE BLOCKS

USPTO serial 76284187

CONNEXIONS OFFICE BLOCKS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
BELENKER, ESTHER
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with CONNEXIONS OFFICE BLOCKS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Howard N. Aronson

HOWARD N ARONSON LACKENBACH SIEGELP O BOX 416SCARSDALE, NY 10583-0416UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
020INTERIOR VERTICAL OFFICE DIVIDERSACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 18, 2002ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED—
Dec 11, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 20, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 20, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jul 26, 2002CNRUDISAPPROVAL - AMENDMENT TO USE MAILED—
Apr 29, 2002AUPCAMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Apr 4, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 4, 2002IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILED—
Apr 4, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Mar 15, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 11, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 11, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Mar 1, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Feb 27, 200244EDSEC. 44(E) CLAIM DELETED—
Aug 31, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 27, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance