Drawing for FRESH FROM THE START

USPTO serial 76284275

FRESH FROM THE START

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
LORENZO, ROBERT
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with FRESH FROM THE START?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

NORM D. ST. LANDAU

DRINKER BIDDLE & REATH LLPNORM D ST LANDAU1500 K ST NW STE 1100WASHINGTON, DC 20005-1208

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
029PROCESSED FRUITS; SOUPS; SOUP MIXES; COLE SLAW; DRIED SOYBEANS; PEELED GARLIC; PEELED SHALLOTS; PREPARED EDAMAME; STIR FRY KITS CONSISTING PRIMARILY OF VEGETABLES AND MEAT WITH SEASONING MIX; STEW KITS CONSISTING PRIMARILY OF VEGETABLES AND MEAT WITH SEASONING MIXACTIVE—
030SPICES, BREAD-BASED STUFFING; FAJITA KITS CONSISTING PRIMARILY OF TORTILLAS AND SEASONING MIX WITH VEGETABLES AND MEAT; STIR FRY KITS CONSISTING PRIMARILY OF SEASONING MIX WITH VEGETABLES AND MEAT; STEW KITS CONSISTING PRIMARILY OF SEASONING MIX WITH VEGETABLES AND MEATACTIVE—
031FRESH EDAMAME; FRESH YUCCA; FRESH GARLIC; FRESH SHALLOTS; FRESH GINGER; FRESH CILANTRO AND FRESH HERBSACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 23, 2006MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Feb 23, 2006ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jun 24, 2005EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED—
Jun 15, 2005EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED—
Jun 15, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jan 12, 2005EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Dec 10, 2004EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Dec 10, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Aug 3, 2004CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Jul 7, 2004EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Jun 30, 2004DPCCDIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Jun 17, 2004EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Jun 17, 2004DRRRDIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED—
Jun 17, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Feb 17, 2004EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Dec 17, 2003EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Dec 17, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jul 9, 2003EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Jun 17, 2003EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Jun 17, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Dec 17, 2002NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Sep 24, 2002PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Sep 4, 2002NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jun 19, 2002CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
May 2, 2002CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Mar 7, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 11, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 29, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance