USPTO serial 76284497
IFAST
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jun 20, 2006
- Examiner
- BUONGIORNO, CHRISTOPHER L
- Law office
- GENERIC WEB UPDATE
What this means
This registration is in, or will soon enter, a USPTO maintenance window. Missing a Section 8 or Section 9 filing can cancel the registration.
Need help with IFAST?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Get help with this Renewal, set up monitoring, or talk with CopyMark.
Get Attorney Assistance for just $748*
Plus Government fees of $1,700
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
INTERNATIONAL FINANCIAL DATA SERVICES (C
TORONTO, ONTARIO, CA
Other trademarks owned by INTERNATIONAL FINANCIAL DATA SERVICES (C
INTERNATIONAL FINANCIAL DATA SERVICES (CANADA) LIMITED
TORONTO, ONTARIO, CA
Other trademarks owned by INTERNATIONAL FINANCIAL DATA SERVICES (CANADA) LIMITED
Toronto, M5H 3R3, Ontario, CA
Toronto, M5H 3R3, Ontario, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Amanda J. Mooney
Amanda J. Mooney Goodman Mooney LLP18012 Cowan, 2nd FloorIrvine, CA 92614UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | [ Computer software for database management for use by financial institutions in managing and tracking mutual fund and other securities investments, and manuals and instructional materials provided therewith, and electronic publications, namely, release notes, user guides, product sheets that are available in PDF format on CD-Rom and which may be downloaded from the Internet ] | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 036 | Financial services, namely, electronic investment fund transfer and transaction services of third party mutual funds and securities | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Computer consulting services, namely, customizing computer software to customer requirements; database development services; providing application hosting services, namely, providing online access to customized software applications that encompass an investor record-keeping system for use by financial institutions in managing and tracking mutual fund and other securities investments, through dedicated line, Internet and wireless electronic communications networks | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by INTERNATIONAL FINANCIAL DATA SERVICES (C
- Other trademarks owned by INTERNATIONAL FINANCIAL DATA SERVICES (CANADA) LIMITED
- Other trademarks owned by DST CANADA INC.
- Other trademarks owned by DST CANADA INC.
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 036
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named IFAST
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 20, 2025 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 9, 2021 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 9, 2021 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 9, 2021 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 21, 2016 | NA89 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 9 - E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 21, 2016 | RNL1 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Jun 21, 2016 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Jun 20, 2016 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 20, 2015 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 29, 2011 | NA85 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 29, 2011 | C15P | REGISTERED - PARTIAL SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Aug 29, 2011 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jul 18, 2011 | 815F | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) & SEC. 15 FILED | — |
| Jul 18, 2011 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 18, 2011 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 18, 2011 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 20, 2006 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jun 20, 2006 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| May 9, 2006 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| May 8, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 4, 2006 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| May 2, 2006 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| May 2, 2006 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| May 2, 2006 | SNEA | SU-EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 16, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 14, 2006 | RECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED | — |
| Mar 14, 2006 | CNCF | SU - ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 9, 2006 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Mar 9, 2006 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Mar 6, 2006 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Feb 28, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 28, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 31, 2005 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 31, 2005 | CNFR | SU - FINAL REFUSAL - WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 11, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jul 29, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 29, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 1, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 1, 2005 | CNRT | SU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 25, 2005 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jan 13, 2005 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jan 13, 2005 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Jul 13, 2004 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Apr 20, 2004 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 31, 2004 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 31, 2004 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 5, 2004 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 18, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 18, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 7, 2003 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 8, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Sep 9, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 9, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 10, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 25, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 9, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 9, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 18, 2002 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 13, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 26, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 26, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 13, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |