USPTO serial 76284775
OPTIMA 100
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- KING, LINDA M
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with OPTIMA 100?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
David A. Roodman
DAVID A ROODMAN BRYAN CAVE LLP211 N BROADWAY STE 3600ST LOUIS, MO 63102-2733UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 030 | Breakfast Cereal | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 15, 2006 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Feb 15, 2006 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 31, 2005 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| May 10, 2005 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| May 10, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 2, 2004 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 12, 2004 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Nov 12, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 2, 2004 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| May 27, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| May 19, 2004 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| May 19, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 24, 2003 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 24, 2003 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Nov 24, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 12, 2003 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| May 12, 2003 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| May 12, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 10, 2002 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Sep 17, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 28, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 24, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 20, 2002 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Mar 13, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 6, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 6, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 11, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 30, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |