USPTO serial 76285208
HAP
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- GAYNOR, BARBARA ANNE
- Law office
- DIVISIONAL UNIT
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with HAP?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Matthew M. Catlett
MATTHEW M CATLETT GENAISSANCE PHARMACEUTICALSFIVE SCIENCE PARKNEW HAVEN, CT 06511UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | Biogenetic materials, namely, nucleic acids for use in the field of pharmaceutical clinical development and scientific research | ACTIVE | — |
| 005 | Biogenetic materials, namely, nucleic acids for use in the field of medical and clinical diagnostics | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Scientific and laboratory research, consulting in the fields of genomics, pharmaceutical clinical development and therapeutics, genetics and diagnostics | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Genaissance Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Genaissance Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 001
- Other trademarks in Class 005
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named HAP
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 27, 2005 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 27, 2005 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Oct 18, 2004 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 27, 2004 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Aug 27, 2004 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 30, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Apr 28, 2004 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 27, 2004 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Feb 27, 2004 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 6, 2003 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Sep 5, 2003 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 27, 2003 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Aug 27, 2003 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 27, 2003 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| May 10, 2003 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 21, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 19, 2003 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Aug 27, 2002 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jun 4, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 15, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 10, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 19, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 17, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 30, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 29, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |