USPTO serial 76285402
BEST OF SAN FRANCISCO
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- May 18, 2004
- Examiner
- LOUGHRAN, BARBARA
- Law office
- POST REGISTRATION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with BEST OF SAN FRANCISCO?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
John L. Hay
John L. Hay Gust Rosenfeld PLCOne East Washington StreetSuite 1600Phoenix, AZ 85004-2553Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | CONDUCTING INCENTIVE AWARDS PROGRAMS, THE RESULTS OF WHICH ARE PUBLISHED IN A NEWSPAPER OF GENERAL CIRCULATION, WHICH PROMOTE THE BUSINESS OF RETAIL ESTABLISHMENTS THROUGH THE DEMONSTRATION OF EXCELLENCE IN CONSUMER SERVICE, QUALITY OF PRODUCTS OR SERVICES, AND GENERALLY IN THEIR FIELD | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jun 26, 1996 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by NT Media, LLC
- Other trademarks owned by NT Media, LLC
- Other trademarks owned by NT Media, LLC
- Other trademarks owned by VILLAGE VOICE MEDIA HOLDINGS, LLC
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Similar marks named BEST OF SAN FRANCISCO
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 19, 2014 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Nov 12, 2010 | NOSU | NOTICE OF SUIT | — |
| Oct 22, 2010 | NOSU | NOTICE OF SUIT | — |
| Aug 19, 2010 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 19, 2010 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 24, 2009 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Jun 13, 2009 | PLGL | ASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL | — |
| Jun 11, 2009 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 19, 2006 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Feb 7, 2006 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| May 18, 2004 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Feb 24, 2004 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Feb 17, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 4, 2004 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Dec 15, 2003 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 7, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 7, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 2, 2003 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 28, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Apr 4, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 4, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 30, 2002 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 31, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 8, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 10, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 25, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |