USPTO serial 76285458
PINPOINT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- NEVILLE, BRIAN
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with PINPOINT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
John S. Mortimer,
JOHN S MORTIMER WOOD PHILLIPS VANSANTEN ET AL500 W MADISON ST STE 3800CHICAGO, IL 60661-4592UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | Marine motor, marine motors with computer controlled automatic navigation and steering capability, and parts therefor, namely propellers, mounting brackets, mounting bracket extenders, mounting plates to convert to existing mounts, controls, and foot pedal controls | ACTIVE | — |
| 009 | Marine sonar display units, fish finders, depth finders, marine G.P.S. navigational units, and parts therefor, namely cables, transducers, speed sensors, and temperature sensors, and sensors, instrumentation, and gages for use with marine motors | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 30, 2003 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Dec 30, 2002 | RECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED | — |
| Nov 25, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 25, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 22, 2002 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 28, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 28, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 25, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 18, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |