USPTO serial 76285462
SIMON NICO
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 2706273Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Apr 15, 2003
- Examiner
- WEIMER, CAROLINE
- Law office
- SCANNING ON DEMAND
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with SIMON NICO?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Janice Leverett
JANICE LEVERETT SOULES WALLACE100 W HOUSTON ST STE 1500SAN ANTONIO, TX 78205-1433UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | EYEGLASSES, EYEGLASS LENSES, EYEGLASS FRAMES, EYEGLASS CHAINS, EYEGLASS CASES, SUNGLASSES, AND CONTACT LENS CASES | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | May 14, 2001 |
| 025 | CLOTHING, NAMELY, CAPS, BASEBALL CAPS, CLOTHING CAPS, BATHING CAPS, CLOTHING BELTS, HOODS, JERSEYS, SHORT SETS, TIES, TOPS, WRAPS, PANTS, T-SHIRTS, SHORTS, SLACKS, PANTS, SWEAT PANTS, BALLOON PANTS, SOCKS, ANKLETS, THERMAL SOCKS, WATER SOCKS, HATS, SHIRTS, T-SHIRTS, SWEAT SHIRTS, POLO SHIRTS, NIGHT SHIRTS, KNIT SHIRTS, GOLF SHIRTS, SPORT SHIRTS, SCARVES, GLOVES, SKI GLOVES, SKI PANTS, SHOES, ATHLETIC SHOES AND GOLF SHOES | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | May 14, 2001 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Simon Nico Corporation
- Other trademarks owned by Simon Nico Corporation
- Other trademarks owned by Simon Nico Corporation
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 025
- Similar marks named SIMON NICO
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 21, 2009 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Apr 30, 2008 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Aug 23, 2006 | CORV | REVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE | — |
| Apr 21, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 15, 2003 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jan 21, 2003 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 1, 2003 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Nov 14, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 23, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 23, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 23, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 18, 2002 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 5, 2002 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Aug 28, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 28, 2002 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 16, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 16, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 20, 2002 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 4, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 5, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 29, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |