USPTO serial 76285540
THE TECHNOLOGY MARKETING COMPANY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- KING, LINDA M
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with THE TECHNOLOGY MARKETING COMPANY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Donald H. Adler
DONALD H ADLER FINNERAN & NICHOLSON PC44 MERRIMAC STNEWBURYPORT, MA 01950UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Business marketing consulting services and business management consultation for industrial, commercial and consumer products and services, namely, assessment and evaluation of business marketing programs; Providing promotional materials, tools and information, namely, market research and evaluation; Providing promotional strategy and creative concept development, namely, preparing advertising brochures, worldwide Web site content and creating corporate logos, corporate identity and brand identity for others; Direct mail consulting services; telemarketing; Promoting and conducting trade show exhibitions in the fields of advertising, aerospace, education, electronics, government, financial services, hardware, light and heavy equipment, media and publication, travel and communications; Preparing annual business reports and business data sheets | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 9, 2003 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 12, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 6, 2002 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 12, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 11, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 17, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 31, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 24, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |