Drawing for WYNN COLLECTION

USPTO serial 76285707

WYNN COLLECTION

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
FICKES, JERI J
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with WYNN COLLECTION?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Lauri S. Thompson

Lauri S. Thompson GREENBERG TRAURIG LLP3773 HOWARD HUGHES PKWYSTE 500 NLAS VEGAS, NV 89169

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035Retail store services featuring clothing and accessories, jewelry, beauty products, leather goods, toys and games, stationery, glassware, beverageware and tableware; art galleriesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 21, 2009MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Sep 21, 2009ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Feb 20, 2009EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED—
Feb 20, 2009EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED—
Feb 20, 2009EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Aug 21, 2008EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Aug 21, 2008EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Aug 21, 2008EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Mar 17, 2008EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Feb 22, 2008EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Feb 22, 2008EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Sep 18, 2007EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Aug 15, 2007EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Aug 15, 2007EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
May 10, 2007EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Feb 16, 2007EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Feb 16, 2007EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Aug 22, 2006NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jul 7, 2006ETOPEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE PROCESS - TERMINATED—
Mar 16, 2006ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED—
Feb 21, 2006PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Feb 1, 2006NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Oct 4, 2005ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Oct 4, 2005REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Mar 23, 2005DMCCDATA MODIFICATION COMPLETED—
Jan 12, 2005PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Sep 13, 2004CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Sep 10, 2004ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Sep 10, 2004ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Sep 10, 2004ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Sep 10, 2004ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Sep 7, 2004XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Sep 7, 2004CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED—
Sep 3, 2004XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Sep 3, 2004XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Sep 3, 2004CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Aug 16, 2004ZZZYPREVIOUS ACTION COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Apr 12, 2004CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Nov 12, 2003DMCCDATA MODIFICATION COMPLETED—
Nov 12, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Oct 31, 2003CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 1, 2003CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED—
Jul 25, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 25, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jan 23, 2003CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 13, 2003UNPRUNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED—
Jan 13, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jul 9, 2002CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 18, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 8, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Nov 7, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 16, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 25, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance