Drawing for BANK SYSTEMS & TECHNOLOGY

USPTO serial 76285728

BANK SYSTEMS & TECHNOLOGY

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 2696839Status 800Registered
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Mar 11, 2003
Examiner
FRENCH, CURTIS W
Law office
GENERIC WEB UPDATE

What this means

Status 800 means the registration was renewed after acceptable combined Section 8 and Section 9 filings. The mark remains registered for another 10-year term with active federal protection. Calendar the next Section 8 and 9 deadline in 10 years and maintain monitoring.

Status 800: Status 800 means the registration was renewed after acceptable combined Section 8 and Section 9 filings. The mark remains registered for another 10-year term with active federal protection.

Need help with BANK SYSTEMS & TECHNOLOGY?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

William C. Wright

William C. Wright Epstein Drangel LLP60 East 42nd Street, Suite 1250New York, NY 10165UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
042COMPUTER SERVICES, NAMELY PROVIDING AN ONLINE MAGAZINE IN THE FIELD OF FINANCIAL TECHNOLOGY, HIGH TECHNOLOGY AND INFORMATION TECHNOLOGYACTIVEJun 20, 2001

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 18, 2023NA89NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 9 - E-MAILED—
Sep 18, 2023RNL2REGISTERED AND RENEWED (SECOND RENEWAL - 10 YRS)The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active.
Sep 18, 202389AGREGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTEDThe USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary.
Sep 18, 2023APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Apr 5, 2023ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Mar 10, 2023E89RTEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED—
Mar 11, 2022REM2COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED—
Aug 16, 2017ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Aug 16, 2017REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Jun 25, 2013TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Feb 23, 2013NA89NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 9 - E-MAILED—
Feb 23, 2013RNL1REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS)The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active.
Feb 23, 201389AGREGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTEDThe USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary.
Feb 23, 2013APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Feb 13, 2013ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Feb 8, 2013E89RTEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED—
Oct 25, 2010CORVREVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE—
Oct 14, 2010MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Dec 5, 2009ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 5, 2009REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Jan 31, 20098.OKREGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTEDThe USPTO accepted your Section 8 declaration showing the mark is still in use in commerce (or excusable nonuse). This satisfies the six-year maintenance requirement and keeps the registration active until the next renewal deadline.
Jan 30, 2009PLGLASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL—
Jan 28, 2009ES8RTEAS SECTION 8 RECEIVED—
May 6, 2008CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Apr 23, 2008ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Feb 23, 2006ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 23, 2006REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Nov 18, 2005ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Nov 18, 2005REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Mar 12, 2003TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Mar 11, 2003R.SRREGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTERYour mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application.
Jan 21, 2003CNTAAPPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER—
Dec 23, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 23, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Oct 9, 2002TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jul 25, 2002CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Apr 29, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 11, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 11, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Sep 10, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 31, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance