Drawing for COTTONSCRUBSANDCOMPANY.COM

USPTO serial 76286049

COTTONSCRUBSANDCOMPANY.COM

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
VOGLER, ANN LINNEHAN
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with COTTONSCRUBSANDCOMPANY.COM?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

TIMOTHY D. PECSENYE

TIMOTHY D PECSENYE BLANK ROME COMISKY & MCCAULEY1 LOGAN SQ FL 3PHILADELPHIA, PA 19103-6930UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035RETAIL STORE SERVICES OFFERED VIA THE INTERNET FEATURING CLOTHING AND MEDICAL UNIFORMS; AND MAIL ORDER CATALOG SERVICES FEATURING CLOTHING, SHOES, UNIFORMS, MEDICAL UNIFORMS, MEDICAL EQUIPMENT, AND MEDICAL ACCESSORIESACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 6, 2003ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Nov 6, 2003JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Nov 6, 2003EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Nov 6, 2003EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Jul 3, 2003EXPAEX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED—
May 9, 2003CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED—
Mar 11, 2003JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Nov 27, 2002CNCFCONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED—
Nov 21, 2002JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Nov 21, 2002EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Nov 5, 2002EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Oct 23, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Apr 15, 2002CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jan 25, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 18, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 10, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 10, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 7, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance