USPTO serial 76286088
VIPER
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BROWNE, DAYNA
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with VIPER?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Bruce A. McDonald
BRUCE A MCDONALD WILEY REIN & FIELDING LLP1776 K ST NWWASHINGTON, DC 20006-2304UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 037 | Management of Internet protocols (IPs); and construction and management of IP Virtual Private Networks (VPNs) on a wholesale level | ACTIVE | — |
| 038 | Telecommunications services, namely, providing wholesale, network-based Internet protocol (IP) virtual private networks (VPNs), including fiber optic connectivity and related design, equipment, and implementation, to carriers, Internet service providers (ISPs) and other service providers; providing IP VPN services that leverage a high performance, high capacity proprietary network by placing it at the center of the VPN, connecting geographically diverse sites in a flexible, scalable, and secure fully meshed network; and providing MPLS (multi-protocol label switching) and BGP (border gateway patrol) routing technologies for IP VPNs; providing connection services for computer networks through a combination of Internet protocol routing and optical internetworking; transmission of voice, information, and data over Internet protocol-based networks; providing backbone telecommunications network services for others on a wholesale basis | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Consultancy services relating to the construction and management of Internet protocol hardware devices in wholesale VPNs; computer network design services; security services for Internet protocol-based networks, namely MPLS tunnels; provisioning and management in order to partition customers' secure virtual private networks; provisioning and management (namely, fault configuration, performance, accounting and security management of data transmission within virtual private networks | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 23, 2002 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 3, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 25, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |