USPTO serial 76286095
PREFERRED MERCHANT PROGRAM
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- WELLS, KELLEY L
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with PREFERRED MERCHANT PROGRAM?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Andrew N Spivak
ANDREW N SPIVAK MORRISON & FOERSTER LLP1650 TYSONS BLVD STE 300MCLEAN, VA 22102-3915UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | DISSEMINATION OF ADVERTISING MATTER; PROMOTING THE GOODS AND SERVICES OF THIRD PARTY RETAILERS BY PROVIDING SALES PROMOTION, DISTRIBUTING PRINTED MATERIALS, DISSEMINATING ADVERTISING FOR OTHERS VIA THE INTERNET, AND PROVIDING HYPERTEXT LINKS TO THE WEB SITES OF OTHERS; AND PROVIDING BUSINESS MARKETING AND CONSUMER DEMOGRAPHIC INFORMATION | ACTIVE | Jan 22, 2002 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 30, 2004 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 16, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 25, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 25, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 24, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jul 5, 2003 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Apr 3, 2003 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Apr 3, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 11, 2003 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Dec 17, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 27, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Oct 7, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 4, 2002 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Sep 30, 2002 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 18, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 15, 2002 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 4, 2002 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Mar 1, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 24, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 30, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |