USPTO serial 76286254
PLEXISOME
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- WELLS, KELLEY L
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with PLEXISOME?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Richard A. Gaffin
RICHARD A GAFFIN MILLER, CANFIELD, PADDOCK AND STONE1200 CAMPAU SQ PLZ99 MONROE AVE NWGRAND RAPIDS, MI 49503-2639Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | DIAGNOSTIC REAGENTS FOR SCIENTIFIC OR RESEARCH CONSISTING OF MODIFIED CHROMOSOMES AND MODIFIED CHROMOSOME FRAGMENTS FOR USE IN CONNECTION WITH GENETIC MATERIALS | ACTIVE | — |
| 005 | DIAGNOSTIC REAGENTS FOR CLINICAL OR MEDICAL LABORATORY USE CONSISTING OF MODIFIED CHROMOSOMES AND MODIFIED CHROMOSOME FRAGMENTS; ASSAYS FOR MEDICAL DIAGNOSTIC USE IN THE FIELD OF GENETICS | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Rubicon Genomics, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Rubicon Genomics, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 001
- Other trademarks in Class 005
- Similar marks named PLEXISOME
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 16, 2008 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jan 16, 2008 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Dec 15, 2006 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 15, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 20, 2006 | INCE | ITU OFFICE ACTION ISSUED FOR EXTENSION REQUEST | — |
| Sep 29, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 26, 2006 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Jul 15, 2006 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 29, 2006 | PGEX | PETITION GRANTED - EXTENSION REQUEST FILED | — |
| Apr 27, 2006 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 27, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 12, 2006 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Apr 12, 2006 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 24, 2006 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Feb 24, 2006 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Dec 29, 2005 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Nov 21, 2005 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 21, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 12, 2005 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Sep 26, 2005 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 26, 2005 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jun 12, 2005 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 12, 2005 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Oct 12, 2004 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Aug 18, 2004 | ETOP | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE PROCESS - TERMINATED | — |
| Dec 8, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 8, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 8, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 18, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jul 8, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 1, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 28, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 28, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 14, 2002 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 19, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 31, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 31, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |