USPTO serial 76286430
POLITICAL COMPLIANCE SERVICES, INC.
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3059660Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Feb 14, 2006
- Examiner
- MICHELI, ANGELA M
- Law office
- GENERIC WEB UPDATE
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with POLITICAL COMPLIANCE SERVICES, INC.?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Scott J. Major
Scott J. Major MILLEN, WHITE, ZELANO & BRANIGAN, PC2200 CLARENDON BLVD, STE 1400ARLINGTON, VA 22201UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | Election law compliance service and related consultation services | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | May 18, 2001 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 28, 2026 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Feb 14, 2025 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 19, 2016 | NA89 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 9 - E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 19, 2016 | RNL1 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Apr 19, 2016 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Apr 19, 2016 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Feb 11, 2016 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 14, 2015 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 22, 2011 | NAS8 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 - E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 22, 2011 | 8.OK | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED | The USPTO accepted your Section 8 declaration showing the mark is still in use in commerce (or excusable nonuse). This satisfies the six-year maintenance requirement and keeps the registration active until the next renewal deadline. |
| Sep 21, 2011 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Sep 19, 2011 | ES8R | TEAS SECTION 8 RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 19, 2011 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Sep 19, 2011 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 14, 2006 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Feb 14, 2006 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Jan 5, 2006 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 4, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 7, 2005 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 7, 2005 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Nov 9, 2004 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 10, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 3, 2004 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Sep 3, 2004 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Jun 30, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 23, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 11, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 11, 2004 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Apr 29, 2004 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Apr 22, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 18, 2004 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Feb 4, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jan 22, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 22, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 24, 2003 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Aug 7, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 7, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 25, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 21, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 9, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 9, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 12, 2002 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 9, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 12, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 21, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 21, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 13, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 14, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |