USPTO serial 76286454
WANXIANG
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 614
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- NEVILLE, BRIAN
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with WANXIANG?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Zheliang Province 311215, CN
Zheliang Province 311215, CN
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
LANNING G. BRYER
LANNING G BRYER LADAS & PARRY26 W 61ST STNEW YORK, NY 10023-7604UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | Electric generators; engines other than for land vehicles; motors for boats; motors and engines for machines; transmissions for machines; rotators for machines; transmission shafts other than for land vehicles, universal joint assemblies, bearings for machines, constant-velocity universal joint, spherical-cage universal joint, balls, needle balls, cages, shock absorber assemblies, pedestals for bearings, axle sleeves, rubber seals; machine shaft couplings; and hoists | ACTIVE | — |
| 012 | omnibuses; cars; lorries; bodies for vehicles; undercarriages for vehicles; engines for land vehicles; hydraulic circuits for vehicles; motorcycles; bicycles; tires for vehicle wheels; airbags for automobiles; anti-brake-system (ABS) comprised of automotive brake shoes; transmission shafts for automobiles; and bearings for automobiles | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 30, 2004 | PETD | PETITION TO REVIVE-DENIED | — |
| May 17, 2004 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Jan 26, 2004 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 26, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 17, 2003 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Nov 24, 2003 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 8, 2003 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Jun 26, 2003 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 5, 2003 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| May 5, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 15, 2003 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Oct 15, 2002 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jul 23, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 3, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 13, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 28, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 18, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 18, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 21, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 17, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |