USPTO serial 76286660
ART + TECH
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- DWYER, SEAN
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with ART + TECH?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
John P. Courtney
JOHN P COURTNEY ANDREWS & KURTH LLP600 TRAVIS ST STE 4200HOUSTON, TX 77002-2910UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 041 | CASINO, GAMBLING, GAMING AND BETTING SERVICES; LIVE ENTERTAINMENT AND MUSICAL ENTERTAINMENT SERVICES; NIGHTCLUB SERVICES; HEALTH AND LEISURE CLUB SERVICES; PROVISION OF SPORT, LEISURE AND RECREATIONAL FACILITIES; ARRANGING AND CONDUCTING OF FUNCTIONS, CONFERENCES, CONVENTIONS, EXHIBITIONS, SEMINARS AND MEETINGS; THEATRE, OPERA AND CONCERT TICKET RESERVATIONS | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | ACCOMMODATION, HOTEL, MOTEL, BAR, CAFE, RESTAURANT, BANQUETING AND CATERING SERVICES; PROVISION OF FOOD AND DRINK; HOTEL MANAGEMENT; HOTEL RESERVATION; PROVISION OF TEMPORARY ACCOMMODATION; PROVISION OF FUNCTION, CONFERENCE, CONVENTION, EXHIBITION, SEMINAR AND MEETING FACILITIES; SECURITY SERVICES RELATING TO VALUABLES; HOUSEKEEPING SERVICES | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 20, 2002 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 11, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 6, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |