Drawing for DCS

USPTO serial 76286695

DCS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
BRYAN JOHNSON, HELLEN
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with DCS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

JOHN CLARKE HOLMAN,

JOHN CLARKE HOLMAN JACOBSON PRICE HOLMAN & STERN PLLC400 7TH ST NWWASHINGTON, DC 20004-2237UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
006SIGN BOARDS OF METAL; METAL TRACKS FOR RAIL VEHICLES; METAL BELLS; BUILDING MATERIALS OF METAL, NAMELY METAL WALL MOUNTED SIGNAGE; METAL FREE STANDING SIGNAGE; METAL VEHICLE LOCKS AND KEYS; METALLIC PIPES AND TUBES; GOODS OF COMMON METAL, NAMELY METAL WHEEL RACKSACTIVE—
012vehicles for locomotion by land, air or water, namely, trucks, motorcycles, motorized scooters, boats, ships, airplanes, helicopters, jet airplanes and water jet boats; vehicle wheels, hubs and rims; internal combustion engines for land vehiclesACTIVE—
016paper, namely wrapping papers; cardboard and goods made from these materials not contained in other classes, namely signboards; stationery, namely, letterhead and name cards; paper boxes; newspapers for general circulation; paper signboards; stickers; adhesives for stationery or household purposesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 21, 2006MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Mar 21, 2006ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jul 20, 2005EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Jul 8, 2005EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Jul 8, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Dec 30, 2004EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Dec 8, 2004EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Dec 8, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Aug 2, 2004EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Jul 6, 2004EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Jul 6, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jan 13, 2004NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Oct 21, 2003PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Oct 1, 2003NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Sep 2, 2003CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Aug 14, 2003CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Jul 22, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 22, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jan 23, 2003CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 22, 2003DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 22, 2003DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 22, 2003DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 16, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 11, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 14, 2002CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 13, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 11, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 11, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 6, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance