Drawing for MILK...THE MOTHERLODE

USPTO serial 76286749

MILK...THE MOTHERLODE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
GRAY, CAROLYN
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 111 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 602: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with MILK...THE MOTHERLODE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Karen A. McGee

KAREN A MCGEE BARNES & THORNBURG750 17TH ST NW STE 900WASHINGTON, DC 20006-4607UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
011Refrigerated bulk vehicular containers for milkACTIVE—
016Paper and cardboard containers for milk and dairy productsACTIVE—
021Plastic household containers for milk and diary productsACTIVE—
029Milk and dairy products excluding ice cream, ice milk, and frozen yogurtACTIVE—
035Promoting the goods and services of others by preparing and placing advertisements and informational communications in all types of media, namely, printed materials for newspapers, magazines, brochures, public display, signage, television and radio broadcasts, electronic media accessible through a global computer networkACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB2): The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 18, 2008MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Nov 18, 2008ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Mar 31, 2008CNSIINQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED—
Mar 31, 2008CNSISUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN—
Mar 6, 2008RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Aug 29, 2007RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Jan 3, 2007RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Jan 3, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jun 6, 2006CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Jun 6, 2006CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Jun 5, 2006ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
May 12, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 12, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Nov 14, 2005CNSIINQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED—
Nov 11, 2005CNSISUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN—
Aug 22, 2005RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Feb 22, 2005CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Feb 21, 2005CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Feb 11, 2005ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Jan 18, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 18, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jul 16, 2004CNSIINQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED—
Dec 30, 2003CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Dec 15, 2003CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Nov 20, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 20, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
May 20, 2003CNSIINQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED—
Jan 9, 2003DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 14, 2002CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Jul 26, 2002CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED—
Mar 28, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 28, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Mar 21, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 25, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 20, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 15, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance